The black box of grading

TentamenzaalFoto: Beeldbank EUR / Eric Fecken

Door Brian Godor – 5 september 2016

One of the most important things that students get from university is their grades. This quote from Aiken from the 1960’s still seems very valid today. But questioning the black box that surrounds grading and assessment almost amounts to colleagueal heresy.

This study examined the grading standards among 11 faculties using students’ pre-entry grades as an indicator for academic strength. The initial analysis revealed that equally strong students would receive significantly different grades if they enrolled in an other faculty. This is evidence of differential grading standards. Subsequent analysis revealed that faculties that had the strongest academic students enrolled had the most stringent grading standards. Equally, faculties that had the weakest academic students has the least stringent grading standards. This is evidence of adaptation theory. In other words, teachers appear to take into consideration the normal academic level of the enrolled students when assessing students work instead of judging students work on it true merits.

Read the full article.

Over Brian GodorBrian Godor

Brian Godor behaalde in 2012  zijn doctoraat aan de Open Universiteit van
Engeland. Zijn proefschrift richtte zich op studentbetrokkenheid en student uitval. In dit proefschrift werd een model studentbetrokkenheid voor het Nederlandse Hoger Beroeps Onderwijs ontwikkeld. Brian Godor is verbonden aan de opleiding Pedagogiek van de Erasmus Universtiteit Rotterdam.

Advertenties

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s